remain: be identified

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents error
Weight: 0.44
, record
Weight: 0.44
, issue
Weight: 0.44
, verb
Weight: 0.43
, friend
Weight: 0.43
Siblings keep
Weight: 0.28
, slip
Weight: 0.28
, uncertainty
Weight: 0.28
, status
Weight: 0.28
, probable cause
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
be identified 1.00
be in canada identified 0.82
be identified via records 0.81
be identified via dental records 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(remain, be identified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(status, be in canada identified)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(remain, be identified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(status, be in canada identified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(status, be in canada identified)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(remain, be identified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(remain, be identified)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(remain, be identified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(remain, be identified via records)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(remain, be identified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(remain, be identified via dental records)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(remain, be identified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(remain, be identified via dental records)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(remain, be identified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(remain, be identified via records)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(remain, be identified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(remain, be identified via dental records)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(remain, be identified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(remain, be identified via records)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(remain, be identified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(remain, be identified via dental records)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(remain, be identified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(remain, be identified via records)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(remain, be identified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(remain, be identified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(remain, be identified)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(remain, be identified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(remain, be identified)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(remain, be identified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(status, be in canada identified)