remote control: control cars

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents control
Weight: 0.80
, electronic device
Weight: 0.72
, interface
Weight: 0.66
, information
Weight: 0.65
Siblings joystick
Weight: 0.56
, computer monitor
Weight: 0.36
, network device
Weight: 0.36
, security system
Weight: 0.35
, computer network
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
control cars 1.00
control remote cars 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(control, control remote cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(remote control, control cars)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(remote control, control cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(control, control remote cars)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(remote control, control cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(control, control remote cars)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(control, control remote cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(remote control, control cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(remote control, control cars)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(remote control, control cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(remote control, control cars)

Similarity expansion

0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(remote control, control cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(remote control, control remote cars)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(remote control, control cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(remote control, control remote cars)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(remote control, control cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(remote control, control remote cars)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(remote control, control cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(remote control, control remote cars)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(remote control, control cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(remote control, control cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(remote control, control cars)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(remote control, control cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(remote control, control cars)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(remote control, control cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(control, control remote cars)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(remote control, control cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(control, control remote cars)