removing: is painful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.40
, vegetation
Weight: 0.39
, step
Weight: 0.33
, method
Weight: 0.31
Siblings clearing
Weight: 0.29
, lifting
Weight: 0.29
, cleaning
Weight: 0.28
, planting
Weight: 0.28
, exercising
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
is painful 1.00
is difficult 0.77
be through difficult 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(removing, is painful)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(exercising, is painful)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(removing, is painful)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(exercising, is difficult)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(removing, is painful)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(exercising, is painful)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(exercising, is painful)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(removing, is painful)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(exercising, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(exercising, is difficult)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(removing, is painful)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(removing, is painful)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(removing, is painful)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(removing, is difficult)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(removing, is painful)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(removing, be through difficult)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(removing, is painful)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(removing, is difficult)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(removing, is painful)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(removing, be through difficult)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(removing, is painful)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(removing, is difficult)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(removing, is painful)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(removing, be through difficult)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(removing, is painful)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(removing, be through difficult)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(removing, is painful)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(removing, is difficult)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(removing, is painful)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(removing, is painful)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(removing, is painful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(removing, is painful)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(removing, is painful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(removing, is painful)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(exercising, is painful)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(removing, is painful)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(exercising, is difficult)