rent: be supposed paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents payment
Weight: 0.66
, price
Weight: 0.64
, sum
Weight: 0.62
, amount
Weight: 0.61
Siblings ground rent
Weight: 0.37
, fee
Weight: 0.34
, allowance
Weight: 0.34
, purchase
Weight: 0.33
, reimbursement
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be supposed paid 1.00
be meant paid 0.91
be paid 0.91
be paid at beginning 0.86
be paid at beginning of month 0.82
be paid in advance 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(rent, be supposed paid)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(fee, be paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(rent, be supposed paid)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(fee, be paid)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(fee, be paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(rent, be supposed paid)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(rent, be supposed paid)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(rent, be supposed paid)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(rent, be paid)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(rent, be supposed paid)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(rent, be paid)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(rent, be supposed paid)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(rent, be meant paid)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(rent, be supposed paid)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(rent, be paid)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(rent, be supposed paid)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(rent, be meant paid)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(rent, be supposed paid)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(rent, be paid at beginning)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(rent, be supposed paid)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(rent, be meant paid)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(rent, be supposed paid)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(rent, be paid at beginning)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(rent, be supposed paid)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(rent, be meant paid)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(rent, be supposed paid)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(rent, be paid)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(rent, be supposed paid)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(rent, be paid at beginning)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(rent, be supposed paid)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rent, be paid at beginning of month)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(rent, be supposed paid)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(rent, be paid at beginning)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(rent, be supposed paid)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(rent, be paid in advance)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(rent, be supposed paid)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(rent, be paid at beginning of month)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(rent, be supposed paid)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(rent, be paid in advance)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(rent, be supposed paid)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(rent, be paid at beginning of month)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(rent, be supposed paid)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(rent, be paid in advance)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(rent, be supposed paid)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rent, be paid at beginning of month)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(rent, be supposed paid)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(rent, be paid in advance)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(rent, be supposed paid)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(rent, be supposed paid)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(rent, be supposed paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(rent, be supposed paid)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(rent, be supposed paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(rent, be supposed paid)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(fee, be paid)