renter: need homeowners insurance

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.53
, third party
Weight: 0.50
, tenant
Weight: 0.47
, life
Weight: 0.47
Siblings landlord
Weight: 0.34
, homeless person
Weight: 0.34
, elderly person
Weight: 0.33
, buyer
Weight: 0.32
, one person
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
need homeowners insurance 1.00
need renters insurance 0.92
has state insurance 0.84
is mortgage crisis 0.77
is next mortgage crisis 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(tenant, need renters insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(renter, need homeowners insurance)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(renter, need homeowners insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(tenant, need renters insurance)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(renter, need homeowners insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(tenant, need renters insurance)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(tenant, need renters insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(renter, need homeowners insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(renter, need homeowners insurance)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(renter, need homeowners insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(renter, need homeowners insurance)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(renter, need homeowners insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(renter, need renters insurance)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(renter, need homeowners insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(renter, need renters insurance)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(renter, need homeowners insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(renter, need renters insurance)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(renter, need homeowners insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(renter, has state insurance)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(renter, need homeowners insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(renter, need renters insurance)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(renter, need homeowners insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(renter, is mortgage crisis)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(renter, need homeowners insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(renter, is next mortgage crisis)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(renter, need homeowners insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(renter, has state insurance)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(renter, need homeowners insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(renter, is mortgage crisis)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(renter, need homeowners insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(renter, is next mortgage crisis)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(renter, need homeowners insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(renter, has state insurance)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(renter, need homeowners insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(renter, is mortgage crisis)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(renter, need homeowners insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(renter, has state insurance)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(renter, need homeowners insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(renter, is next mortgage crisis)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(renter, need homeowners insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(renter, is mortgage crisis)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(renter, need homeowners insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(renter, is next mortgage crisis)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(renter, need homeowners insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(renter, need homeowners insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(renter, need homeowners insurance)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(renter, need homeowners insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(renter, need homeowners insurance)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(renter, need homeowners insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(tenant, need renters insurance)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(renter, need homeowners insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(tenant, need renters insurance)