repairing: be supposed work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents work
Weight: 0.50
, problem
Weight: 0.47
, service
Weight: 0.44
, building
Weight: 0.44
, activity
Weight: 0.41
Siblings mowing
Weight: 0.30
, maintenance
Weight: 0.30
, plowing
Weight: 0.30
, damage
Weight: 0.30
, sewing
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be supposed work 1.00
work 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(repairing, be supposed work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(damage, work)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(repairing, be supposed work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(sewing, work)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(repairing, be supposed work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(repairing, be supposed work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(maintenance, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(maintenance, work)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(repairing, be supposed work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(sewing, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(sewing, work)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(repairing, be supposed work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(damage, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(damage, work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(repairing, be supposed work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(repairing, be supposed work)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(repairing, be supposed work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(repairing, work)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(repairing, be supposed work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(repairing, work)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(repairing, be supposed work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(repairing, work)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(repairing, be supposed work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(repairing, work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(repairing, be supposed work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(repairing, be supposed work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(repairing, be supposed work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(repairing, be supposed work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(repairing, be supposed work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(repairing, be supposed work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(maintenance, work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(repairing, be supposed work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(sewing, work)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(repairing, be supposed work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(damage, work)