repetition: improve performance

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents element
Weight: 0.64
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, parameter
Weight: 0.59
Siblings melody
Weight: 0.33
, randomness
Weight: 0.33
, cliche
Weight: 0.33
, rhythm
Weight: 0.33
, characteristic
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
improve performance 1.00
improve memory 0.82
has quality good 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(repetition, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(cliche, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(repetition, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(characteristic, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(repetition, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(rhythm, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(repetition, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(cliche, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(cliche, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(repetition, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(characteristic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(repetition, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(rhythm, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(rhythm, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(repetition, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(repetition, improve performance)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(repetition, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(repetition, improve memory)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(repetition, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(repetition, improve memory)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(repetition, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(repetition, improve memory)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(repetition, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(repetition, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(repetition, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(repetition, improve memory)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(repetition, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(repetition, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(repetition, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(repetition, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(repetition, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(repetition, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(repetition, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(repetition, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(repetition, improve performance)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(repetition, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(repetition, improve performance)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(repetition, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cliche, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(repetition, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(repetition, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(rhythm, has quality good)