repetition: is good persuasive technique

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents element
Weight: 0.64
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, parameter
Weight: 0.59
Siblings melody
Weight: 0.33
, randomness
Weight: 0.33
, cliche
Weight: 0.33
, rhythm
Weight: 0.33
, characteristic
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good persuasive technique 1.00
is persuasive technique 0.99
is good technique 0.90
is effective technique 0.89
is persuasive 0.89
be used in persuasive writing 0.87
is technique used 0.86
has state technique 0.85
is technique used in music 0.84
is technique widely used 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(repetition, is good persuasive technique)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(repetition, is good persuasive technique)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(repetition, is good persuasive technique)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(repetition, is persuasive technique)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(repetition, is good persuasive technique)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(repetition, is effective technique)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(repetition, is good persuasive technique)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(repetition, is technique used)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(repetition, is good persuasive technique)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(repetition, be used in persuasive writing)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(repetition, is good persuasive technique)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(repetition, is persuasive technique)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(repetition, is good persuasive technique)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(repetition, be used in persuasive writing)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(repetition, is good persuasive technique)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(repetition, is persuasive)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(repetition, is good persuasive technique)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(repetition, be used in persuasive writing)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(repetition, is good persuasive technique)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(repetition, is persuasive technique)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(repetition, is good persuasive technique)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(repetition, is technique used)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(repetition, is good persuasive technique)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(repetition, is persuasive)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(repetition, is good persuasive technique)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(repetition, is effective technique)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(repetition, is good persuasive technique)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(repetition, be used in persuasive writing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(repetition, is good persuasive technique)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(repetition, is persuasive technique)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(repetition, is good persuasive technique)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(repetition, is persuasive)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(repetition, is good persuasive technique)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(repetition, is persuasive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(repetition, is good persuasive technique)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(repetition, has state technique)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(repetition, is good persuasive technique)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(repetition, is technique used in music)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(repetition, is good persuasive technique)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(repetition, is good technique)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(repetition, is good persuasive technique)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(repetition, is technique widely used)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(repetition, is good persuasive technique)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(repetition, is good technique)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(repetition, is good persuasive technique)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(repetition, has state technique)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(repetition, is good persuasive technique)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(repetition, is technique used in music)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(repetition, is good persuasive technique)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(repetition, is technique used)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(repetition, is good persuasive technique)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(repetition, is effective technique)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(repetition, is good persuasive technique)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(repetition, is technique widely used)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(repetition, is good persuasive technique)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(repetition, is good technique)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(repetition, is good persuasive technique)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(repetition, is good technique)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(repetition, is good persuasive technique)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(repetition, has state technique)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(repetition, is good persuasive technique)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(repetition, is technique used in music)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(repetition, is good persuasive technique)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(repetition, is technique used in music)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(repetition, is good persuasive technique)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(repetition, is technique widely used)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(repetition, is good persuasive technique)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(repetition, is technique widely used)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(repetition, is good persuasive technique)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(repetition, has state technique)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(repetition, is good persuasive technique)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(repetition, is effective technique)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(repetition, is good persuasive technique)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(repetition, is technique used)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(repetition, is good persuasive technique)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(repetition, is good persuasive technique)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(repetition, is good persuasive technique)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(repetition, is good persuasive technique)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(repetition, is good persuasive technique)