replication: be important to process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents function
Weight: 0.63
, feature
Weight: 0.60
, operation
Weight: 0.58
, technology
Weight: 0.58
Siblings trigonometric function
Weight: 0.33
, configuration
Weight: 0.33
, synthesis
Weight: 0.33
, cell signaling
Weight: 0.32
, recombination
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to process 1.00
is important process 1.00
be important element of process 0.91
has physical part process 0.88
is important cell process 0.86
is cell process 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(replication, be important to process)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(replication, be important to process)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(replication, be important to process)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(replication, has physical part process)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(replication, be important to process)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(replication, has physical part process)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(replication, be important to process)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(replication, is cell process)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(replication, be important to process)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(replication, is important process)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(replication, be important to process)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(replication, is important process)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(replication, be important to process)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(replication, has physical part process)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(replication, be important to process)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(replication, is cell process)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(replication, be important to process)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(replication, be important element of process)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(replication, be important to process)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(replication, be important element of process)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(replication, be important to process)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(replication, is cell process)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(replication, be important to process)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(replication, be important element of process)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(replication, be important to process)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(replication, is important process)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(replication, be important to process)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(replication, is important process)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(replication, be important to process)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(replication, is important cell process)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(replication, be important to process)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important element of process)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(replication, be important to process)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(replication, is important cell process)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(replication, be important to process)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(replication, is important cell process)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(replication, be important to process)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(replication, is important cell process)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(replication, be important to process)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(replication, has physical part process)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(replication, be important to process)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(replication, is cell process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(replication, be important to process)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(replication, be important to process)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important to process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(replication, be important to process)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(replication, be important to process)