report: be for abusive chat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents analysis
Weight: 0.67
, evidence
Weight: 0.66
, study
Weight: 0.66
, policy
Weight: 0.65
Siblings article
Weight: 0.73
, opinion
Weight: 0.66
, publication
Weight: 0.65
, testimony
Weight: 0.63
, release
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for abusive chat 1.00
be for abusive chat handled 0.94
be for chat 0.84
be for chat handled 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(report, be for abusive chat)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(report, be for abusive chat)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(report, be for abusive chat)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(report, be for abusive chat handled)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(report, be for abusive chat)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(report, be for abusive chat handled)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(report, be for abusive chat)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(report, be for abusive chat handled)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(report, be for abusive chat)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(report, be for chat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(report, be for abusive chat)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(report, be for chat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(report, be for abusive chat)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(report, be for chat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(report, be for abusive chat)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(report, be for chat handled)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(report, be for abusive chat)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(report, be for abusive chat handled)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(report, be for abusive chat)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(report, be for chat handled)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(report, be for abusive chat)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(report, be for chat handled)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(report, be for abusive chat)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(report, be for chat)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(report, be for abusive chat)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(report, be for chat handled)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(report, be for abusive chat)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(report, be for abusive chat)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(report, be for abusive chat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(report, be for abusive chat)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(report, be for abusive chat)