reporter: have under threat jobs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents journalist
Weight: 0.75
, idiot
Weight: 0.60
, job
Weight: 0.57
, authority
Weight: 0.55
Siblings stringer
Weight: 0.49
, editor
Weight: 0.34
, photographer
Weight: 0.34
, critic
Weight: 0.31
, waiter
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
have under threat jobs 1.00
be under threat 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(job, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(reporter, have under threat jobs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(reporter, have under threat jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(job, be under threat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(reporter, have under threat jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(job, be under threat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(job, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(reporter, have under threat jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(reporter, have under threat jobs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(reporter, have under threat jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(reporter, have under threat jobs)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(reporter, have under threat jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(reporter, be under threat)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(reporter, have under threat jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(reporter, be under threat)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(reporter, have under threat jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(reporter, be under threat)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(reporter, have under threat jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(reporter, be under threat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(reporter, have under threat jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(reporter, have under threat jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(reporter, have under threat jobs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(reporter, have under threat jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(reporter, have under threat jobs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(reporter, have under threat jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(job, be under threat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(reporter, have under threat jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(job, be under threat)