reporting: be crucial to process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents information
Weight: 0.59
, activity
Weight: 0.58
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, analysis
Weight: 0.57
, issue
Weight: 0.57
Siblings report
Weight: 0.33
, business activity
Weight: 0.32
, compliance
Weight: 0.32
, cost benefit analysis
Weight: 0.32
, verification
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be crucial to process 1.00
be crucial to scientific process 0.91
is necessary 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(analysis, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(reporting, be crucial to process)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(factor, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(reporting, be crucial to process)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(reporting, be crucial to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(factor, is necessary)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(reporting, be crucial to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(analysis, is necessary)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(reporting, be crucial to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(analysis, is necessary)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(reporting, be crucial to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(factor, is necessary)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(reporting, be crucial to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(verification, is necessary)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(reporting, be crucial to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(compliance, is necessary)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(analysis, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(reporting, be crucial to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(reporting, be crucial to process)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(factor, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(reporting, be crucial to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(reporting, be crucial to process)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(reporting, be crucial to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(compliance, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(compliance, is necessary)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(reporting, be crucial to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(verification, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(verification, is necessary)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(reporting, be crucial to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(reporting, be crucial to process)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(reporting, be crucial to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(reporting, be crucial to scientific process)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(reporting, be crucial to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(reporting, is necessary)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(reporting, be crucial to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(reporting, be crucial to scientific process)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(reporting, be crucial to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(reporting, be crucial to scientific process)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(reporting, be crucial to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(reporting, is necessary)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(reporting, be crucial to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(reporting, be crucial to scientific process)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(reporting, be crucial to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(reporting, is necessary)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(reporting, be crucial to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(reporting, is necessary)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(reporting, be crucial to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(reporting, be crucial to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(reporting, be crucial to process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(reporting, be crucial to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(reporting, be crucial to process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(reporting, be crucial to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(factor, is necessary)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(reporting, be crucial to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(analysis, is necessary)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(reporting, be crucial to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(compliance, is necessary)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(reporting, be crucial to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(verification, is necessary)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(reporting, be crucial to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(factor, is necessary)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(reporting, be crucial to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(analysis, is necessary)