reptile: be called reptile

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.63
, animal
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, cold blooded animal
Weight: 0.59
Siblings frog
Weight: 0.78
, turtle
Weight: 0.77
, lizard
Weight: 0.76
, alligator
Weight: 0.75
, monitor lizard
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called reptile 1.00
is frog 0.78
is animals 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, is animals)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(reptile, be called reptile)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(reptile, be called reptile)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, is animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(reptile, be called reptile)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, is animals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, is animals)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(reptile, be called reptile)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(reptile, be called reptile)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(reptile, be called reptile)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(reptile, be called reptile)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(reptile, be called reptile)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(reptile, is frog)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(reptile, be called reptile)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(reptile, is animals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(reptile, be called reptile)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(reptile, is animals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(reptile, be called reptile)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(reptile, is animals)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(reptile, be called reptile)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(reptile, is frog)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(reptile, be called reptile)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(reptile, is animals)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(reptile, be called reptile)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(reptile, is frog)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(reptile, be called reptile)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(reptile, is frog)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(reptile, be called reptile)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(reptile, be called reptile)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(reptile, be called reptile)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(reptile, be called reptile)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(reptile, be called reptile)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(reptile, be called reptile)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(animal, is animals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(reptile, be called reptile)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(animal, is animals)