republican: be against net neutrality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.61
, idiot
Weight: 0.58
, candidate
Weight: 0.58
, critic
Weight: 0.55
, party
Weight: 0.55
Siblings george
Weight: 0.64
, libertarian
Weight: 0.57
, liberal party
Weight: 0.35
, democratic party
Weight: 0.35
, political party
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be against net neutrality 1.00
support net neutrality 0.96
be opposed to net neutrality 0.95
oppose net neutrality 0.94
be against neutrality 0.92
waste time on net neutrality 0.91
repeal net neutrality 0.88
is anti-net neutrality 0.88
support neutrality 0.85
be opposed to neutrality 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(republican, be against net neutrality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(libertarian, be against net neutrality)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(republican, be against net neutrality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(libertarian, be against net neutrality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(libertarian, be against net neutrality)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(republican, be against net neutrality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(republican, be against net neutrality)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(republican, be against net neutrality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(republican, support net neutrality)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(republican, be against net neutrality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(republican, support net neutrality)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(republican, be against net neutrality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(republican, support net neutrality)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(republican, be against net neutrality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(republican, support net neutrality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(republican, be against net neutrality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(republican, be against net neutrality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(republican, be against net neutrality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(republican, be against net neutrality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(republican, be against net neutrality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(republican, be against net neutrality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(libertarian, be against net neutrality)