researcher: know about distribution of data

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents psychologist
Weight: 0.72
, expert
Weight: 0.65
, person
Weight: 0.59
, study
Weight: 0.58
Siblings author
Weight: 0.73
, scientist
Weight: 0.70
, professor
Weight: 0.69
, colleague
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
know about distribution of data 1.00
collect data 0.81
collect demographic data 0.79
manipulate data 0.77
transform data 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(researcher, know about distribution of data)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(researcher, know about distribution of data)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(researcher, know about distribution of data)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(researcher, collect data)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(researcher, know about distribution of data)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(researcher, collect data)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(researcher, know about distribution of data)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(researcher, manipulate data)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(researcher, know about distribution of data)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(researcher, transform data)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(researcher, know about distribution of data)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(researcher, manipulate data)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(researcher, know about distribution of data)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(researcher, collect data)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(researcher, know about distribution of data)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(researcher, manipulate data)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(researcher, know about distribution of data)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(researcher, manipulate data)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(researcher, know about distribution of data)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(researcher, transform data)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(researcher, know about distribution of data)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(researcher, collect data)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(researcher, know about distribution of data)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(researcher, transform data)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(researcher, know about distribution of data)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(researcher, transform data)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(researcher, know about distribution of data)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(researcher, know about distribution of data)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(researcher, know about distribution of data)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(researcher, know about distribution of data)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(researcher, know about distribution of data)