researcher: travel to antarctica

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents psychologist
Weight: 0.72
, expert
Weight: 0.65
, person
Weight: 0.59
, study
Weight: 0.58
Siblings author
Weight: 0.73
, scientist
Weight: 0.70
, professor
Weight: 0.69
, colleague
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
travel to antarctica 1.00
go to antarctica 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(researcher, travel to antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(scientist, go to antarctica)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(researcher, travel to antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(scientist, go to antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(scientist, go to antarctica)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(researcher, travel to antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(researcher, travel to antarctica)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(researcher, travel to antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(researcher, go to antarctica)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(researcher, travel to antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(researcher, go to antarctica)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(researcher, travel to antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(researcher, go to antarctica)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(researcher, travel to antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(researcher, go to antarctica)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(researcher, travel to antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(researcher, go to antarctica)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(researcher, travel to antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(researcher, go to antarctica)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(researcher, travel to antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(researcher, go to antarctica)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(researcher, travel to antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(researcher, go to antarctica)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(researcher, travel to antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(researcher, travel to antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(researcher, travel to antarctica)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(researcher, travel to antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(researcher, travel to antarctica)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(researcher, travel to antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(scientist, go to antarctica)