researcher: use null hypothesis

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents psychologist
Weight: 0.72
, expert
Weight: 0.65
, person
Weight: 0.59
, study
Weight: 0.58
Siblings author
Weight: 0.73
, scientist
Weight: 0.70
, professor
Weight: 0.69
, colleague
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
use null hypothesis 1.00
formulate null hypothesis 0.94
use hypothesis 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(researcher, use null hypothesis) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(scientist, use hypothesis)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(researcher, use null hypothesis) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(scientist, use hypothesis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(scientist, use hypothesis)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(researcher, use null hypothesis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(researcher, use null hypothesis)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(researcher, use null hypothesis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(researcher, use hypothesis)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(researcher, use null hypothesis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(researcher, formulate null hypothesis)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(researcher, use null hypothesis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(researcher, formulate null hypothesis)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(researcher, use null hypothesis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(researcher, use hypothesis)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(researcher, use null hypothesis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(researcher, formulate null hypothesis)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(researcher, use null hypothesis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(researcher, formulate null hypothesis)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(researcher, use null hypothesis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(researcher, use hypothesis)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(researcher, use null hypothesis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(researcher, use hypothesis)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(researcher, use null hypothesis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(researcher, use null hypothesis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(researcher, use null hypothesis)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(researcher, use null hypothesis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(researcher, use null hypothesis)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(researcher, use null hypothesis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(scientist, use hypothesis)