reservation: was set up by spokane indians

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.63
, order
Weight: 0.58
, area
Weight: 0.55
, activity
Weight: 0.54
Siblings rosebud
Weight: 0.45
, escort service
Weight: 0.34
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33
, service station
Weight: 0.33
, postal service
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was set up by spokane indians 1.00
was set up in america 0.84
were set up in america 0.84
be set up in america 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(reservation, was set up by spokane indians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(reservation, was set up by spokane indians)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(reservation, was set up by spokane indians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(reservation, be set up in america)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(reservation, was set up by spokane indians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(reservation, was set up in america)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(reservation, was set up by spokane indians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(reservation, was set up in america)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(reservation, was set up by spokane indians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(reservation, were set up in america)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(reservation, was set up by spokane indians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(reservation, were set up in america)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(reservation, was set up by spokane indians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(reservation, was set up in america)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(reservation, was set up by spokane indians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(reservation, were set up in america)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(reservation, was set up by spokane indians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(reservation, be set up in america)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(reservation, was set up by spokane indians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(reservation, be set up in america)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(reservation, was set up by spokane indians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(reservation, be set up in america)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(reservation, was set up by spokane indians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(reservation, was set up in america)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(reservation, was set up by spokane indians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(reservation, were set up in america)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(reservation, was set up by spokane indians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(reservation, was set up by spokane indians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(reservation, was set up by spokane indians)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(reservation, was set up by spokane indians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(reservation, was set up by spokane indians)