resident: be in oakland subdvision

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.65
, member
Weight: 0.61
, community
Weight: 0.61
, user
Weight: 0.56
, employee
Weight: 0.55
Siblings elderly person
Weight: 0.64
, naturalist
Weight: 0.55
, businessman
Weight: 0.55
, settler
Weight: 0.54
, gardener
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in oakland subdvision 1.00
be in oakland subdvision in rotorua upset 0.92
leave california 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(resident, be in oakland subdvision) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(resident, be in oakland subdvision)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(resident, be in oakland subdvision) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(resident, be in oakland subdvision in rotorua upset)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(resident, be in oakland subdvision) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(resident, be in oakland subdvision in rotorua upset)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(resident, be in oakland subdvision) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(resident, be in oakland subdvision in rotorua upset)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(resident, be in oakland subdvision) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(resident, be in oakland subdvision in rotorua upset)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(resident, be in oakland subdvision) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(resident, leave california)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(resident, be in oakland subdvision) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(resident, leave california)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(resident, be in oakland subdvision) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(resident, leave california)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(resident, be in oakland subdvision) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(resident, leave california)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(resident, be in oakland subdvision) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(resident, be in oakland subdvision) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(resident, be in oakland subdvision)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(resident, be in oakland subdvision) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(resident, be in oakland subdvision)