resolution: be important to short story

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents action
Weight: 0.69
, agreement
Weight: 0.68
, document
Weight: 0.67
, provision
Weight: 0.65
Siblings council
Weight: 0.67
, proposal
Weight: 0.66
, end
Weight: 0.61
, amendment
Weight: 0.36
, bill
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to short story 1.00
be important in story 0.92
be important to story 0.92
be short of money 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(action, be important in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(resolution, be important to short story)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(resolution, be important to short story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(action, be important in story)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(resolution, be important to short story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(action, be important in story)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(resolution, be important to short story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(council, be short of money)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(action, be important in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(resolution, be important to short story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(resolution, be important to short story)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(resolution, be important to short story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(council, be short of money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(council, be short of money)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(resolution, be important to short story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(resolution, be important to short story)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(resolution, be important to short story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(resolution, be important in story)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(resolution, be important to short story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(resolution, be important to story)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(resolution, be important to short story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(resolution, be important in story)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(resolution, be important to short story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(resolution, be important to story)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(resolution, be important to short story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(resolution, be important in story)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(resolution, be important to short story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(resolution, be important to story)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(resolution, be important to short story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(resolution, be important in story)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(resolution, be important to short story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(resolution, be important to story)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(resolution, be important to short story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(resolution, be important to short story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(resolution, be important to short story)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(resolution, be important to short story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(resolution, be important to short story)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(resolution, be important to short story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(action, be important in story)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(resolution, be important to short story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(council, be short of money)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(resolution, be important to short story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(action, be important in story)