resolution: be related to process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents action
Weight: 0.69
, agreement
Weight: 0.68
, document
Weight: 0.67
, provision
Weight: 0.65
Siblings council
Weight: 0.67
, proposal
Weight: 0.66
, end
Weight: 0.61
, amendment
Weight: 0.36
, bill
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to process 1.00
be related to lawmaking process 0.80
be important to process of digestion 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(action, be important to process of digestion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(resolution, be related to process)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(resolution, be related to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(action, be important to process of digestion)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(resolution, be related to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(action, be important to process of digestion)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(action, be important to process of digestion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(resolution, be related to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(resolution, be related to process)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(resolution, be related to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(resolution, be related to process)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(resolution, be related to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(resolution, be related to lawmaking process)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(resolution, be related to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(resolution, be related to lawmaking process)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(resolution, be related to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(resolution, be related to lawmaking process)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(resolution, be related to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(resolution, be related to lawmaking process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(resolution, be related to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(resolution, be related to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(resolution, be related to process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(resolution, be related to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(resolution, be related to process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(resolution, be related to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(action, be important to process of digestion)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(resolution, be related to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(action, be important to process of digestion)