resource: be important to area

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.60
, professional
Weight: 0.59
, document
Weight: 0.59
, barrier
Weight: 0.58
Siblings natural gas
Weight: 0.72
, mineral
Weight: 0.68
, solar energy
Weight: 0.67
, coral reef
Weight: 0.65
, guide
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to area 1.00
be important to organisation 0.82
be important for development of country 0.79
be important to people 0.77
be important for development 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(resource, be important to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(coral reef, be important to people)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(resource, be important to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(mineral, be important to people)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(resource, be important to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(mineral, be important to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(mineral, be important to people)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(resource, be important to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(coral reef, be important to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(coral reef, be important to people)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(resource, be important to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(resource, be important to area)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(resource, be important to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(resource, be important to organisation)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(resource, be important to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(resource, be important for development of country)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(resource, be important to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(resource, be important to organisation)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(resource, be important to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(resource, be important to people)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(resource, be important to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(resource, be important for development)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(resource, be important to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(resource, be important for development of country)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(resource, be important to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(resource, be important to people)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(resource, be important to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(resource, be important for development)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(resource, be important to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(resource, be important to organisation)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(resource, be important to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(resource, be important to organisation)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(resource, be important to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(resource, be important to people)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(resource, be important to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(resource, be important to people)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(resource, be important to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(resource, be important for development of country)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(resource, be important to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(resource, be important for development)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(resource, be important to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(resource, be important for development of country)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(resource, be important to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(resource, be important for development)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(resource, be important to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(resource, be important to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(resource, be important to area)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(resource, be important to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(resource, be important to area)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(resource, be important to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(coral reef, be important to people)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(resource, be important to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(mineral, be important to people)