restaurant dine area: be at food court

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at food court 1.00
be used to have food 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(restaurant dine area, be at food court)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(restaurant dine area, be at food court)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(restaurant dine area, be at food court)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(restaurant dine area, be used to have food)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(restaurant dine area, be at food court)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(restaurant dine area, be used to have food)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(restaurant dine area, be at food court)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(restaurant dine area, be used to have food)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(restaurant dine area, be at food court)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(restaurant dine area, be used to have food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(restaurant dine area, be at food court)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(restaurant dine area, be at food court)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(restaurant dine area, be at food court)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(restaurant dine area, be at food court)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(restaurant dine area, be at food court)