restaurant dine area: be at michigan

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at michigan 1.00
be at ontario 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(restaurant dine area, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(restaurant dine area, be at michigan)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(restaurant dine area, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(restaurant dine area, be at ontario)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(restaurant dine area, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(restaurant dine area, be at ontario)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(restaurant dine area, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(restaurant dine area, be at ontario)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(restaurant dine area, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(restaurant dine area, be at ontario)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(restaurant dine area, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(restaurant dine area, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(restaurant dine area, be at michigan)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(restaurant dine area, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(restaurant dine area, be at michigan)