restaurant storage area: be at food

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at food 1.00
has food 0.95
be used to store food 0.88
be used to keep food 0.88
be used to store food and beverage 0.86
be used to keep food before it be eat 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(restaurant storage area, be at food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(restaurant storage area, be at food)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(restaurant storage area, be at food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(restaurant storage area, has food)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(restaurant storage area, be at food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(restaurant storage area, has food)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(restaurant storage area, be at food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(restaurant storage area, be used to store food)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(restaurant storage area, be at food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(restaurant storage area, be used to keep food)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(restaurant storage area, be at food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(restaurant storage area, be used to store food and beverage)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(restaurant storage area, be at food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(restaurant storage area, be used to store food and beverage)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(restaurant storage area, be at food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(restaurant storage area, be used to keep food before it be eat)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(restaurant storage area, be at food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(restaurant storage area, be used to store food)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(restaurant storage area, be at food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(restaurant storage area, be used to keep food)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(restaurant storage area, be at food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(restaurant storage area, has food)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(restaurant storage area, be at food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(restaurant storage area, be used to keep food before it be eat)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(restaurant storage area, be at food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(restaurant storage area, be used to store food)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(restaurant storage area, be at food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(restaurant storage area, has food)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(restaurant storage area, be at food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(restaurant storage area, be used to keep food)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(restaurant storage area, be at food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(restaurant storage area, be used to store food and beverage)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(restaurant storage area, be at food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(restaurant storage area, be used to keep food)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(restaurant storage area, be at food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(restaurant storage area, be used to store food)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(restaurant storage area, be at food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(restaurant storage area, be used to store food and beverage)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(restaurant storage area, be at food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(restaurant storage area, be used to keep food before it be eat)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(restaurant storage area, be at food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(restaurant storage area, be used to keep food before it be eat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(restaurant storage area, be at food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(restaurant storage area, be at food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(restaurant storage area, be at food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(restaurant storage area, be at food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(restaurant storage area, be at food)