restaurant table: be at restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at restaurant 1.00
be find in restaurant 0.94
be used to eat in restaurant 0.93
be at restaurant supply store 0.87
be at dine room of hotel 0.81
be used to dine at 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(restaurant table, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(restaurant table, be at restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(restaurant table, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(restaurant table, be find in restaurant)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(restaurant table, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(restaurant table, be used to eat in restaurant)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(restaurant table, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(restaurant table, be used to eat in restaurant)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(restaurant table, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(restaurant table, be at restaurant supply store)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(restaurant table, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(restaurant table, be find in restaurant)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(restaurant table, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(restaurant table, be at restaurant supply store)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(restaurant table, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(restaurant table, be at restaurant supply store)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(restaurant table, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(restaurant table, be find in restaurant)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(restaurant table, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(restaurant table, be used to eat in restaurant)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(restaurant table, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(restaurant table, be at dine room of hotel)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(restaurant table, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(restaurant table, be find in restaurant)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(restaurant table, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(restaurant table, be used to dine at)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(restaurant table, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(restaurant table, be at dine room of hotel)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(restaurant table, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(restaurant table, be at dine room of hotel)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(restaurant table, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(restaurant table, be used to eat in restaurant)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(restaurant table, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(restaurant table, be used to dine at)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(restaurant table, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(restaurant table, be used to dine at)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(restaurant table, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(restaurant table, be at dine room of hotel)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(restaurant table, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(restaurant table, be used to dine at)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(restaurant table, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(restaurant table, be at restaurant supply store)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(restaurant table, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(restaurant table, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(restaurant table, be at restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(restaurant table, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(restaurant table, be at restaurant)