restaurant: be in bengaluru charge

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food chain
Weight: 0.69
, grocery store
Weight: 0.68
, food store
Weight: 0.67
, institution
Weight: 0.64
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.87
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.81
, steakhouse
Weight: 0.80
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.80
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.77

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in bengaluru charge 1.00
charge for water 0.91
charge separately service charge 0.90
have service charge 0.87
charge people for water 0.87
charge extra 0.85
charge interest 0.85
charge for ice 0.83
add service charge 0.83
charge delivery fee 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(institution, charge interest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(restaurant, be in bengaluru charge)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(restaurant, be in bengaluru charge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(institution, charge interest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be in bengaluru charge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(institution, charge interest)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(institution, charge interest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(restaurant, be in bengaluru charge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be in bengaluru charge)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(restaurant, be in bengaluru charge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(restaurant, be in bengaluru charge)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(restaurant, be in bengaluru charge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(restaurant, charge for water)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(restaurant, be in bengaluru charge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(restaurant, charge for water)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(restaurant, be in bengaluru charge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(restaurant, charge for water)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(restaurant, be in bengaluru charge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(restaurant, charge people for water)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(restaurant, be in bengaluru charge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(restaurant, charge people for water)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(restaurant, be in bengaluru charge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, charge people for water)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(restaurant, be in bengaluru charge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(restaurant, charge people for water)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(restaurant, be in bengaluru charge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, charge for water)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(restaurant, be in bengaluru charge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, charge delivery fee)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(restaurant, be in bengaluru charge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(restaurant, charge delivery fee)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(restaurant, be in bengaluru charge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(restaurant, charge delivery fee)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(restaurant, be in bengaluru charge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(restaurant, charge delivery fee)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(restaurant, be in bengaluru charge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(restaurant, be in bengaluru charge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be in bengaluru charge)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(restaurant, be in bengaluru charge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(restaurant, be in bengaluru charge)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be in bengaluru charge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(institution, charge interest)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(restaurant, be in bengaluru charge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(institution, charge interest)