restaurant: be used to have meet

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents grocery store
Weight: 0.68
, institution
Weight: 0.64
, accommodation
Weight: 0.64
, food store
Weight: 0.62
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.87
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.81
, steakhouse
Weight: 0.80
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.80
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.77

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to have meet 1.00
be used to meet person 0.91
be used to meet friend 0.86
be used to meet someone for date 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(food store, be used to meet person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to have meet)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(restaurant, be used to have meet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(food store, be used to meet person)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to have meet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(food store, be used to meet person)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to have meet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to meet friend)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to have meet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to meet person)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(food store, be used to meet person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(restaurant, be used to have meet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to have meet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(restaurant, be used to have meet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to meet person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to meet person)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(restaurant, be used to have meet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to meet friend) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(steakhouse, be used to meet friend)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(restaurant, be used to have meet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(restaurant, be used to have meet)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(restaurant, be used to have meet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to meet someone for date)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(restaurant, be used to have meet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to meet friend)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(restaurant, be used to have meet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(restaurant, be used to meet friend)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(restaurant, be used to have meet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(restaurant, be used to meet someone for date)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(restaurant, be used to have meet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to meet friend)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(restaurant, be used to have meet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to meet someone for date)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(restaurant, be used to have meet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to meet friend)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(restaurant, be used to have meet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to meet someone for date)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(restaurant, be used to have meet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to have meet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to have meet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(restaurant, be used to have meet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to have meet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to have meet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(food store, be used to meet person)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to have meet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to meet person)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to have meet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(steakhouse, be used to meet friend)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(restaurant, be used to have meet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(food store, be used to meet person)