restraint: be vs judicial restraint

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents virtue
Weight: 0.65
, intervention
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, condition
Weight: 0.53
, issue
Weight: 0.51
Siblings discipline
Weight: 0.35
, compassion
Weight: 0.34
, humility
Weight: 0.34
, courage
Weight: 0.33
, respect
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vs judicial restraint 1.00
be vs restraint 0.93
be vs judicial activism 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(restraint, be vs judicial restraint)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(restraint, be vs judicial restraint)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(restraint, be vs judicial restraint)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(restraint, be vs restraint)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(restraint, be vs judicial restraint)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(restraint, be vs restraint)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(restraint, be vs judicial restraint)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(restraint, be vs judicial activism)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(restraint, be vs judicial restraint)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(restraint, be vs judicial activism)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(restraint, be vs judicial restraint)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(restraint, be vs judicial activism)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(restraint, be vs judicial restraint)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(restraint, be vs judicial activism)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(restraint, be vs judicial restraint)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(restraint, be vs restraint)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(restraint, be vs judicial restraint)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(restraint, be vs restraint)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(restraint, be vs judicial restraint)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(restraint, be vs judicial restraint)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(restraint, be vs judicial restraint)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(restraint, be vs judicial restraint)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(restraint, be vs judicial restraint)