retriever: have bad hind legs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.64
, work
Weight: 0.42
, water
Weight: 0.37
, animal
Weight: 0.34
Siblings golden retriever
Weight: 0.78
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.41
, beagle
Weight: 0.37
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.37
, dachshund
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have bad hind legs 1.00
put paw 0.77
bite paws 0.77
have webbed feet 0.76
give paw 0.76
chew on paws 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(retriever, have bad hind legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, have bad hind legs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(retriever, have bad hind legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, have webbed feet)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(retriever, have bad hind legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(labrador retriever, have webbed feet)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(retriever, have bad hind legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, chew on paws)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(retriever, have bad hind legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, have webbed feet)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(retriever, have bad hind legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, bite paws)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(retriever, have bad hind legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(golden retriever, have bad hind legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, have bad hind legs)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(retriever, have bad hind legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, bite paws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, bite paws)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(retriever, have bad hind legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(dachshund, have webbed feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(dachshund, have webbed feet)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(retriever, have bad hind legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(golden retriever, have webbed feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, have webbed feet)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(retriever, have bad hind legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(labrador retriever, have webbed feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(labrador retriever, have webbed feet)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(retriever, have bad hind legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(golden retriever, chew on paws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, chew on paws)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(retriever, have bad hind legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(retriever, have bad hind legs)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(retriever, have bad hind legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(retriever, put paw)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(retriever, have bad hind legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(retriever, give paw)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(retriever, have bad hind legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(retriever, put paw)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(retriever, have bad hind legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(retriever, have webbed feet)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(retriever, have bad hind legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(retriever, chew on paws)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(retriever, have bad hind legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(retriever, give paw)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(retriever, have bad hind legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(retriever, put paw)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(retriever, have bad hind legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(retriever, have webbed feet)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(retriever, have bad hind legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(retriever, chew on paws)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(retriever, have bad hind legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(retriever, have webbed feet)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(retriever, have bad hind legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(retriever, give paw)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(retriever, have bad hind legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(retriever, have webbed feet)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(retriever, have bad hind legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(retriever, chew on paws)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(retriever, have bad hind legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(retriever, put paw)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(retriever, have bad hind legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(retriever, give paw)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(retriever, have bad hind legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(retriever, chew on paws)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(retriever, have bad hind legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(retriever, have bad hind legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(retriever, have bad hind legs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(retriever, have bad hind legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(retriever, have bad hind legs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(retriever, have bad hind legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(golden retriever, have bad hind legs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(retriever, have bad hind legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, bite paws)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(retriever, have bad hind legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(golden retriever, have webbed feet)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(retriever, have bad hind legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(dachshund, have webbed feet)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(retriever, have bad hind legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(labrador retriever, have webbed feet)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(retriever, have bad hind legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(golden retriever, chew on paws)