retriever: have soft mouths

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.64
, work
Weight: 0.42
, water
Weight: 0.37
, animal
Weight: 0.34
Siblings golden retriever
Weight: 0.78
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.41
, beagle
Weight: 0.37
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.37
, dachshund
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have soft mouths 1.00
put things in mouths 0.88
have floppy ears 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, have soft mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, have floppy ears)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, have soft mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(beagle, have floppy ears)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, have soft mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, have soft mouths)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, have soft mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, put things in mouths)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(retriever, have soft mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(golden retriever, have soft mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, have soft mouths)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(retriever, have soft mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(golden retriever, put things in mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, put things in mouths)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(retriever, have soft mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(golden retriever, have floppy ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, have floppy ears)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(retriever, have soft mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(beagle, have floppy ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(beagle, have floppy ears)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(retriever, have soft mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(retriever, have soft mouths)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(retriever, have soft mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(retriever, put things in mouths)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(retriever, have soft mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(retriever, put things in mouths)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(retriever, have soft mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(retriever, put things in mouths)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(retriever, have soft mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(retriever, have floppy ears)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(retriever, have soft mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(retriever, have floppy ears)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(retriever, have soft mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(retriever, have floppy ears)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(retriever, have soft mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(retriever, have floppy ears)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(retriever, have soft mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(retriever, put things in mouths)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(retriever, have soft mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(retriever, have soft mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, have soft mouths)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(retriever, have soft mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(retriever, have soft mouths)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, have soft mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(golden retriever, have soft mouths)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, have soft mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(golden retriever, put things in mouths)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, have soft mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(golden retriever, have floppy ears)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, have soft mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(beagle, have floppy ears)