retriever: love play

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.64
, work
Weight: 0.42
, water
Weight: 0.37
, animal
Weight: 0.34
Siblings golden retriever
Weight: 0.78
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.41
, beagle
Weight: 0.37
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.37
, dachshund
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
love play 1.00
love water 0.83
love food 0.80
love tennis balls 0.78
love socks 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(retriever, love play)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, love tennis balls)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(retriever, love play)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, love play)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(retriever, love play)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(labrador retriever, love water)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(retriever, love play)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, love socks)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(retriever, love play)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, love water)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(retriever, love play)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, love food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(retriever, love play)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(golden retriever, love play)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, love play)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(retriever, love play)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(golden retriever, love water)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, love water)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(retriever, love play)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(labrador retriever, love water)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(labrador retriever, love water)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(retriever, love play)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(golden retriever, love food)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, love food)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(retriever, love play)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(golden retriever, love tennis balls)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, love tennis balls)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(retriever, love play)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(golden retriever, love socks)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, love socks)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(retriever, love play)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(retriever, love play)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(retriever, love play)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(retriever, love water)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(retriever, love play)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(retriever, love water)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(retriever, love play)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(retriever, love water)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(retriever, love play)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(retriever, love water)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(retriever, love play)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(retriever, love play)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(retriever, love play)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(retriever, love play)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(retriever, love play)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(retriever, love play)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(golden retriever, love tennis balls)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(retriever, love play)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(golden retriever, love water)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(retriever, love play)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(golden retriever, love play)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(retriever, love play)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(golden retriever, love food)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(retriever, love play)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(labrador retriever, love water)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(retriever, love play)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(golden retriever, love socks)