revenue: be equal to price

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents business activity
Weight: 0.67
, value
Weight: 0.66
, sale
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, variable
Weight: 0.57
Siblings capital
Weight: 0.59
, profit
Weight: 0.35
, income
Weight: 0.35
, advertising
Weight: 0.34
, investment
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be equal to price 1.00
be equal to cost 0.90
equal cost 0.90
is equal 0.88
be equal to marginal cost 0.85
equal marginal cost 0.85
be less than price 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(revenue, be equal to price)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(revenue, be equal to price)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(revenue, be equal to price)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(revenue, be less than price)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(revenue, be equal to price)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(revenue, be less than price)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(revenue, be equal to price)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be less than price)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(revenue, be equal to price)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(revenue, equal marginal cost)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(revenue, be equal to price)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(revenue, equal marginal cost)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(revenue, be equal to price)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(revenue, be less than price)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(revenue, be equal to price)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be equal to marginal cost)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(revenue, be equal to price)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(revenue, equal marginal cost)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(revenue, be equal to price)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(revenue, be equal to marginal cost)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(revenue, be equal to price)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be equal to cost)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(revenue, be equal to price)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(revenue, equal marginal cost)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(revenue, be equal to price)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(revenue, equal cost)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(revenue, be equal to price)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(revenue, be equal to cost)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(revenue, be equal to price)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(revenue, equal cost)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(revenue, be equal to price)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(revenue, equal cost)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(revenue, be equal to price)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(revenue, is equal)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(revenue, be equal to price)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(revenue, be equal to marginal cost)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(revenue, be equal to price)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(revenue, be equal to cost)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(revenue, be equal to price)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(revenue, equal cost)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(revenue, be equal to price)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(revenue, be equal to cost)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(revenue, be equal to price)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(revenue, is equal)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(revenue, be equal to price)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(revenue, is equal)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(revenue, be equal to price)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(revenue, is equal)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(revenue, be equal to price)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(revenue, be equal to marginal cost)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(revenue, be equal to price)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(revenue, be equal to price)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be equal to price)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(revenue, be equal to price)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(revenue, be equal to price)