revenue: be important to company

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents business activity
Weight: 0.67
, value
Weight: 0.66
, sale
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, variable
Weight: 0.57
Siblings capital
Weight: 0.59
, profit
Weight: 0.35
, income
Weight: 0.35
, advertising
Weight: 0.34
, investment
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to company 1.00
be used as metric for companies 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(value, be important to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(revenue, be important to company)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(revenue, be important to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(value, be important to company)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be important to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(value, be important to company)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(value, be important to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(revenue, be important to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(revenue, be important to company)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(revenue, be important to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(revenue, be important to company)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(revenue, be important to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(revenue, be used as metric for companies)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(revenue, be important to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(revenue, be used as metric for companies)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(revenue, be important to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(revenue, be used as metric for companies)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(revenue, be important to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be used as metric for companies)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(revenue, be important to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(revenue, be important to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be important to company)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(revenue, be important to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(revenue, be important to company)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be important to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(value, be important to company)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(revenue, be important to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(value, be important to company)