revenue: be in percentage of completion method computed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents business activity
Weight: 0.67
, value
Weight: 0.66
, sale
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, variable
Weight: 0.57
Siblings capital
Weight: 0.59
, profit
Weight: 0.35
, income
Weight: 0.35
, advertising
Weight: 0.34
, investment
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in percentage of completion method computed 1.00
be in percentage of completion method 0.94
be in percentage 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(revenue, be in percentage of completion method computed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(revenue, be in percentage of completion method computed)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(revenue, be in percentage of completion method computed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(revenue, be in percentage of completion method)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(revenue, be in percentage of completion method computed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(revenue, be in percentage of completion method)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(revenue, be in percentage of completion method computed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(revenue, be in percentage of completion method)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(revenue, be in percentage of completion method computed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(revenue, be in percentage)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(revenue, be in percentage of completion method computed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(revenue, be in percentage)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(revenue, be in percentage of completion method computed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(revenue, be in percentage)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(revenue, be in percentage of completion method computed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be in percentage of completion method)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(revenue, be in percentage of completion method computed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be in percentage)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(revenue, be in percentage of completion method computed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(revenue, be in percentage of completion method computed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be in percentage of completion method computed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(revenue, be in percentage of completion method computed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(revenue, be in percentage of completion method computed)