review: be at negative

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.62
, work
Weight: 0.60
, analysis
Weight: 0.60
, term
Weight: 0.59
Siblings copy
Weight: 0.59
, ign
Weight: 0.49
, report
Weight: 0.33
, cost benefit analysis
Weight: 0.33
, verification
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at negative 1.00
is negative 0.97
be at now negative 0.96
be done negative 0.88
be at overwhelmingly negative 0.86
be at now overwhelmingly negative 0.85
be done on system negative 0.85
be negative of potential energy 0.84
is negative potential energy 0.84
be seen as positive 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(review, be at negative)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(review, be at negative)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(review, be at negative)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(review, be at now negative)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(review, be at negative)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(review, be at now negative)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(review, be at negative)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(review, be at now negative)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(review, be at negative)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(review, be at overwhelmingly negative)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(review, be at negative)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(review, be at now overwhelmingly negative)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(review, be at negative)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(review, be at overwhelmingly negative)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(review, be at negative)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(review, be at now overwhelmingly negative)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(review, be at negative)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(review, be at overwhelmingly negative)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(review, be at negative)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(review, be at now overwhelmingly negative)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(review, be at negative)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(review, be at now negative)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(review, be at negative)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(review, be at now overwhelmingly negative)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(review, be at negative)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(review, be at overwhelmingly negative)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(review, be at negative)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(review, be at negative)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(review, be at negative)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(review, be at negative)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(review, be at negative)