review: is are censored

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.62
, work
Weight: 0.60
, analysis
Weight: 0.60
, term
Weight: 0.59
Siblings copy
Weight: 0.59
, ign
Weight: 0.49
, report
Weight: 0.33
, cost benefit analysis
Weight: 0.33
, verification
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is are censored 1.00
is are deleted 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(review, is are censored) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(review, is are censored)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(review, is are censored) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(review, is are deleted)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(review, is are censored) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(review, is are deleted)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(review, is are censored) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(review, is are deleted)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(review, is are censored) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(review, is are deleted)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(review, is are censored) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(review, is are censored) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(review, is are censored)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(review, is are censored) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(review, is are censored)