revolution: be for cats expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents civil war
Weight: 0.64
, event
Weight: 0.63
, concept
Weight: 0.60
, change
Weight: 0.59
Siblings republic
Weight: 0.59
, relativity
Weight: 0.56
, revolutionary
Weight: 0.55
, spanish civil war
Weight: 0.34
, vietnam war
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for cats expensive 1.00
be for cats 0.94
is expensive 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(revolution, be for cats expensive)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(republic, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(revolution, be for cats expensive)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(republic, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(republic, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(revolution, be for cats expensive)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(revolution, be for cats expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(revolution, be for cats expensive)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(revolution, be for cats)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(revolution, be for cats expensive)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(revolution, be for cats)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(revolution, be for cats expensive)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(revolution, be for cats)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(revolution, be for cats expensive)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(revolution, be for cats)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(revolution, be for cats expensive)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(revolution, is expensive)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(revolution, be for cats expensive)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(revolution, is expensive)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(revolution, be for cats expensive)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(revolution, is expensive)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(revolution, be for cats expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(revolution, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(revolution, be for cats expensive)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(revolution, be for cats expensive)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(revolution, be for cats expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(revolution, be for cats expensive)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(revolution, be for cats expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(revolution, be for cats expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(republic, is expensive)