reward: be important for employees

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents form
Weight: 0.57
, element
Weight: 0.57
, motive
Weight: 0.56
, opportunity
Weight: 0.55
Siblings praise
Weight: 0.62
, raise
Weight: 0.53
, accolade
Weight: 0.49
, lollipop
Weight: 0.48
, loot
Weight: 0.46

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for employees 1.00
motivate employees 0.85
be of interest to employee 0.81
be important in workplace 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(opportunity, be important in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(reward, be important for employees)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(reward, be important for employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(opportunity, be important in workplace)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(reward, be important for employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, be important in workplace)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(opportunity, be important in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(reward, be important for employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(reward, be important for employees)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(reward, be important for employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(reward, be important for employees)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(reward, be important for employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(reward, be of interest to employee)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(reward, be important for employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(reward, motivate employees)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(reward, be important for employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(reward, motivate employees)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(reward, be important for employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(reward, be important in workplace)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(reward, be important for employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(reward, be of interest to employee)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(reward, be important for employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(reward, motivate employees)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(reward, be important for employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(reward, be important in workplace)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(reward, be important for employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(reward, be important in workplace)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(reward, be important for employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(reward, be important in workplace)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(reward, be important for employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(reward, be of interest to employee)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(reward, be important for employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(reward, motivate employees)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(reward, be important for employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(reward, be of interest to employee)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(reward, be important for employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(reward, be important for employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(reward, be important for employees)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(reward, be important for employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(reward, be important for employees)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(reward, be important for employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(opportunity, be important in workplace)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(reward, be important for employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(opportunity, be important in workplace)