rhetoric: be necessary writing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents discipline
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.59
, art
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, topic
Weight: 0.57
Siblings politics
Weight: 0.34
, hyperbole
Weight: 0.33
, ideology
Weight: 0.33
, agenda
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be necessary writing 1.00
be important in writing 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(topic, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(rhetoric, be necessary writing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(rhetoric, be necessary writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(topic, be important in writing)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, be necessary writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(topic, be important in writing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(topic, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(rhetoric, be necessary writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(rhetoric, be necessary writing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(rhetoric, be necessary writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(rhetoric, be necessary writing)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(rhetoric, be necessary writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, be important in writing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(rhetoric, be necessary writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(rhetoric, be important in writing)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(rhetoric, be necessary writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(rhetoric, be important in writing)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(rhetoric, be necessary writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(rhetoric, be important in writing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(rhetoric, be necessary writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(rhetoric, be necessary writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, be necessary writing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(rhetoric, be necessary writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(rhetoric, be necessary writing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, be necessary writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(topic, be important in writing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(rhetoric, be necessary writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(topic, be important in writing)