rhetoric: considering metalinguistic awareness

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents discipline
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.59
, art
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, topic
Weight: 0.57
Siblings politics
Weight: 0.34
, hyperbole
Weight: 0.33
, ideology
Weight: 0.33
, agenda
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
considering metalinguistic awareness 1.00
considering awareness 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(rhetoric, considering metalinguistic awareness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(rhetoric, considering metalinguistic awareness)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(rhetoric, considering metalinguistic awareness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(rhetoric, considering awareness)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(rhetoric, considering metalinguistic awareness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(rhetoric, considering awareness)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(rhetoric, considering metalinguistic awareness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(rhetoric, considering awareness)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(rhetoric, considering metalinguistic awareness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, considering awareness)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(rhetoric, considering metalinguistic awareness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(rhetoric, considering metalinguistic awareness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, considering metalinguistic awareness)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(rhetoric, considering metalinguistic awareness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(rhetoric, considering metalinguistic awareness)