rhetoric: is valuable

Related concepts

Parents	discipline Weight: 0.61 , subject Weight: 0.59 , art Weight: 0.58 , thing Weight: 0.57 , topic Weight: 0.57
Siblings	politics Weight: 0.34 , hyperbole Weight: 0.33 , ideology Weight: 0.33 , agenda Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is valuable	1.00
is useful	0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(art, is useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(rhetoric, is valuable)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(rhetoric, is valuable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(art, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, is valuable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(art, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, is valuable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(agenda, is useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(art, is useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(rhetoric, is valuable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(rhetoric, is valuable)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(rhetoric, is valuable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(agenda, is useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(agenda, is useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(rhetoric, is valuable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(rhetoric, is valuable)

Similarity expansion

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(rhetoric, is valuable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(rhetoric, is useful)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.91

Salient(rhetoric, is valuable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Salient(rhetoric, is useful)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(rhetoric, is valuable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(rhetoric, is useful)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(rhetoric, is valuable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, is useful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Salient(rhetoric, is valuable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(rhetoric, is valuable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, is valuable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(rhetoric, is valuable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(rhetoric, is valuable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, is valuable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(art, is useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, is valuable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(agenda, is useful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(rhetoric, is valuable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(art, is useful)