rhino: is mammals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.60
, endangered species
Weight: 0.59
Siblings elephant
Weight: 0.39
, rhinoceros
Weight: 0.38
, tiger
Weight: 0.38
, panda bear
Weight: 0.38
, cheetah
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is mammals 1.00
is mammal 0.90
is endangered species 0.80
be important to humans 0.78
look like dinosaurs 0.76
have birds on them 0.76
be different from hippos 0.76
eat rhinos 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(rhino, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, is endangered species)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(rhino, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(rhinoceros, is endangered species)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(rhino, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(cheetah, is mammals)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(rhino, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(elephant, is mammals)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(rhino, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(tiger, is mammal)
...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(rhino, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(cheetah, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(cheetah, is mammals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(rhino, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(elephant, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(elephant, is mammals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(rhino, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(tiger, is mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(tiger, is mammal)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(rhino, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(elephant, is mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(elephant, is mammal)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(rhino, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(rhinoceros, is endangered species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(rhinoceros, is endangered species)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(rhino, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(rhino, is mammals)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(rhino, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(rhino, is mammal)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(rhino, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(rhino, is mammal)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(rhino, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(rhino, be important to humans)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(rhino, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(rhino, is mammal)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(rhino, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(rhino, look like dinosaurs)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(rhino, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(rhino, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(rhino, is mammals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(rhino, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(rhino, is mammals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(rhino, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(cheetah, is mammals)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(rhino, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(elephant, is mammals)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(rhino, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(tiger, is mammal)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(rhino, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(elephant, is mammal)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(rhino, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(rhinoceros, is endangered species)
...