rhododendron: has physical part quick

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.67
, evergreen
Weight: 0.61
, plant
Weight: 0.60
, tree
Weight: 0.58
Siblings hydrangea
Weight: 0.37
, conifer
Weight: 0.37
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part quick 1.00
has physical part zone 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(rhododendron, has physical part quick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fruit tree, has physical part zone)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(rhododendron, has physical part quick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(hydrangea, has physical part zone)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(rhododendron, has physical part quick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(hydrangea, has physical part zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(hydrangea, has physical part zone)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(rhododendron, has physical part quick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(fruit tree, has physical part zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(fruit tree, has physical part zone)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(rhododendron, has physical part quick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(rhododendron, has physical part quick)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(rhododendron, has physical part quick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(rhododendron, has physical part zone)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(rhododendron, has physical part quick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rhododendron, has physical part zone)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(rhododendron, has physical part quick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(rhododendron, has physical part zone)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(rhododendron, has physical part quick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(rhododendron, has physical part zone)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(rhododendron, has physical part quick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(rhododendron, has physical part quick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(rhododendron, has physical part quick)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(rhododendron, has physical part quick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(rhododendron, has physical part quick)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(rhododendron, has physical part quick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(hydrangea, has physical part zone)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(rhododendron, has physical part quick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(fruit tree, has physical part zone)