rib: be attached by cartilage

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.62
, item
Weight: 0.60
, body part
Weight: 0.59
, entree
Weight: 0.58
Siblings steak
Weight: 0.35
, bone
Weight: 0.35
, bone marrow
Weight: 0.35
, forearm
Weight: 0.34
, leg
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be attached by cartilage 1.00
have cartilaginous attachments 0.76
has physical part joints 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(rib, be attached by cartilage)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(bone, has physical part joints)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(rib, be attached by cartilage)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(bone, has physical part joints)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(bone, has physical part joints)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(rib, be attached by cartilage)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(rib, be attached by cartilage)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(rib, be attached by cartilage)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(rib, has physical part joints)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(rib, be attached by cartilage)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(rib, have cartilaginous attachments)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(rib, be attached by cartilage)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(rib, has physical part joints)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(rib, be attached by cartilage)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(rib, have cartilaginous attachments)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(rib, be attached by cartilage)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(rib, has physical part joints)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(rib, be attached by cartilage)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(rib, have cartilaginous attachments)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(rib, be attached by cartilage)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(rib, have cartilaginous attachments)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(rib, be attached by cartilage)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(rib, has physical part joints)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(rib, be attached by cartilage)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(rib, be attached by cartilage)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(rib, be attached by cartilage)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(rib, be attached by cartilage)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(rib, be attached by cartilage)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(rib, be attached by cartilage)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(bone, has physical part joints)