ribosome: be related to city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organelle
Weight: 0.63
, macromolecule
Weight: 0.59
, nucleic acid
Weight: 0.52
, enzyme
Weight: 0.50
, molecule
Weight: 0.46
Siblings lysosome
Weight: 0.35
, cell membrane
Weight: 0.35
, protein
Weight: 0.35
, rna polymerase
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to city 1.00
be related 0.85
be is compared to city 0.82
be related to school 0.82
be related to mall 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(molecule, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ribosome, be related to city)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(organelle, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ribosome, be related to city)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(nucleic acid, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ribosome, be related to city)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(nucleic acid, be related)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(organelle, be related)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(molecule, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(nucleic acid, be related)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(organelle, be related)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(molecule, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(lysosome, be related to city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(lysosome, be related to school)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lysosome, be related)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cell membrane, be related)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(protein, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(molecule, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(ribosome, be related to city)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(organelle, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(ribosome, be related to city)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(nucleic acid, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(ribosome, be related to city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(lysosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(lysosome, be related to city)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(protein, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(protein, be related)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(cell membrane, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(cell membrane, be related)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(lysosome, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(lysosome, be related)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(lysosome, be related to school) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(lysosome, be related to school)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(ribosome, be related to city)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(ribosome, be related)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(ribosome, be is compared to city)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ribosome, be is compared to city)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(ribosome, be is compared to city)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ribosome, be related to school)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(ribosome, be related)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(ribosome, be related)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(ribosome, be is compared to city)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(ribosome, be related to mall)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(ribosome, be related to school)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(ribosome, be related to school)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(ribosome, be related to mall)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(ribosome, be related to mall)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(ribosome, be related to mall)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(ribosome, be related to school)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ribosome, be related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(ribosome, be related to city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ribosome, be related to city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(nucleic acid, be related)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(organelle, be related)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(molecule, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(cell membrane, be related)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(lysosome, be related to city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(lysosome, be related)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(protein, be related)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(lysosome, be related to school)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(nucleic acid, be related)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(organelle, be related)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(ribosome, be related to city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(molecule, be related)