richard wright: was famous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents writer
Weight: 0.64
, artist
Weight: 0.62
, author
Weight: 0.60
, novelist
Weight: 0.60
, figure
Weight: 0.57
Siblings dylan thomas
Weight: 0.37
, henry david thoreau
Weight: 0.37
, robert
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
was famous 1.00
is famous 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(richard wright, was famous)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(robert, is famous)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(richard wright, was famous)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(henry david thoreau, is famous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(richard wright, was famous)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(henry david thoreau, is famous)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(henry david thoreau, is famous)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(richard wright, was famous)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(robert, is famous)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(robert, is famous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(richard wright, was famous)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(richard wright, was famous)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(richard wright, was famous)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(richard wright, is famous)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(richard wright, was famous)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(richard wright, is famous)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(richard wright, was famous)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(richard wright, is famous)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(richard wright, was famous)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(richard wright, is famous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(richard wright, was famous)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(richard wright, was famous)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(richard wright, was famous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(richard wright, was famous)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(richard wright, was famous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(richard wright, was famous)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(robert, is famous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(richard wright, was famous)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(henry david thoreau, is famous)