rider: be at on subway

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.54
, form
Weight: 0.53
, time
Weight: 0.53
, school
Weight: 0.53
Siblings tour de france
Weight: 0.59
, sprinter
Weight: 0.51
, jockey
Weight: 0.31
, school bus
Weight: 0.31
, climber
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at on subway 1.00
be at subway 0.99

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(rider, be at on subway) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(rider, be at on subway)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(rider, be at on subway) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(rider, be at subway)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(rider, be at on subway) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(rider, be at subway)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(rider, be at on subway) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(rider, be at subway)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(rider, be at on subway) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(rider, be at subway)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(rider, be at on subway) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(rider, be at on subway) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(rider, be at on subway)

Typical implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(rider, be at on subway) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(rider, be at on subway)