rider: be unpopular with public

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.54
, form
Weight: 0.53
, time
Weight: 0.53
, school
Weight: 0.53
Siblings tour de france
Weight: 0.59
, sprinter
Weight: 0.51
, aussies
Weight: 0.40
, jockey
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be unpopular with public 1.00
be unpopular with general public 0.96
be frequently unpopular with public 0.94
be frequently unpopular with general public 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(rider, be unpopular with public)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(rider, be unpopular with public)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(rider, be unpopular with public)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(rider, be frequently unpopular with general public)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(rider, be unpopular with public)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(rider, be frequently unpopular with general public)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(rider, be unpopular with public)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(rider, be frequently unpopular with general public)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(rider, be unpopular with public)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(rider, be unpopular with general public)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(rider, be unpopular with public)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(rider, be unpopular with general public)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(rider, be unpopular with public)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(rider, be unpopular with general public)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(rider, be unpopular with public)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(rider, be frequently unpopular with public)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(rider, be unpopular with public)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(rider, be frequently unpopular with general public)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(rider, be unpopular with public)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(rider, be frequently unpopular with public)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(rider, be unpopular with public)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(rider, be unpopular with general public)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(rider, be unpopular with public)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(rider, be frequently unpopular with public)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(rider, be unpopular with public)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(rider, be frequently unpopular with public)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(rider, be unpopular with public)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rider, be unpopular with public)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(rider, be unpopular with public)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(rider, be unpopular with public)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rider, be unpopular with public)