rider: wear breeches

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.54
, form
Weight: 0.53
, time
Weight: 0.53
, school
Weight: 0.53
Siblings tour de france
Weight: 0.59
, sprinter
Weight: 0.51
, aussies
Weight: 0.40
, jockey
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear breeches 1.00
wear jodhpurs 0.83
wear chaps 0.79
wear half chaps 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(rider, wear breeches)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(jockey, wear jodhpurs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(rider, wear breeches)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(jockey, wear jodhpurs)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(jockey, wear jodhpurs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(rider, wear breeches)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(rider, wear breeches)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(rider, wear breeches)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(rider, wear chaps)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(rider, wear breeches)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(rider, wear chaps)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(rider, wear breeches)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(rider, wear chaps)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(rider, wear breeches)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(rider, wear half chaps)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(rider, wear breeches)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(rider, wear chaps)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(rider, wear breeches)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(rider, wear half chaps)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(rider, wear breeches)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(rider, wear jodhpurs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(rider, wear breeches)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(rider, wear half chaps)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(rider, wear breeches)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(rider, wear half chaps)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(rider, wear breeches)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(rider, wear jodhpurs)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(rider, wear breeches)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(rider, wear jodhpurs)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(rider, wear breeches)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(rider, wear jodhpurs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(rider, wear breeches)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(rider, wear breeches)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(rider, wear breeches)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(rider, wear breeches)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(rider, wear breeches)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(rider, wear breeches)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(jockey, wear jodhpurs)